About the Book
The first thing you will need to do to appreciate the unique novelty of the propositions contained in this book, is to look at the Table of Contents below. Then ask yourself where else could you find discussed all of those aspects of how gravity could be created in nature. This theory was developed by Dr Roberts without reference to other person's prior work.
In a single, modern book, Peter Roberts has investigated and reasoned every aspect, laid out his justifications and described with numerous coloured diagrams how it all fits together.
Yet, despite the complexity of the topics covered, the author has concentrated on using the simplest analyses, and always uses clear examples, so that the reader can be confident he/she has the correct grasp of the theory from page 1 to the end of the book.
If you want to be able to say that you know a believable theory for how gravity is created, all you have to do is read this book from beginning to end and then put it on your bookshelf where you can find it easily. That's all.
CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 - THE PRINCIPLE AND PURPOSE OF DECLARING TENETS...................................... 1
CHAPTER 2 - EXAMINATION OF THE FOUR TENETS....................................................................... 3
2.1 TENET 1. THAT GRAVITY WAVES EXIST. .................................................................. 3
2.2 TENET 2. THAT GRAVITATIONAL WAVES ARE TRAVELLING
THROUGH THE UNIVERSE IN EVERY DIRECTION.................................................... 5
2.3 TENET 3. THAT GRAVITATIONAL WAVES PENETRATE AND
PASS THROUGH MATTER WITH GREAT EASE. ....................................................... 13
2.4 TENET 4. THAT IN PASSING THROUGH MATTER, GRAVITATIONAL WAVES
IMPOSE A TINY ACCELERATING FORCE ON EACH ATOM IN THE DIRECTION
OF WAVE PROPAGATION, GIVING UP A MINUTE AMOUNT OF ENERGY
IN EXCHANGE. ............................................................................................................. 16
CHAPTER 3 - HOW IS THE FORCE OF GRAVITY CREATED AND IMPLEMENTED? ...................... 19
3.1 INTRODUCTION TO THE OMNIDIRECTIONAL GRAVITATIONAL WAVE FLUX—
THE UNIVERSAL GRAVITATIONAL FIELD—AND HOW IT WORKS.......................... 19
3.2 THE SPEED OF GRAVITATIONAL COMMUNICATION................................................ 21
3.3 BACKGROUND TO THE EXISTENCE OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVES ........................ 22
3.4 THE PROPOSED MECHANISM FOR THE CREATION OF
GRAVITATIONAL FORCE ............................................................................................. 22
3.5 A NEW EXPLANATION OF SHELL THEORY THAT REPLACES THE
NEWTONIAN INVERSE SQUARE LAW INTERPRETATION........................................ 29
3.6 THE POTENTIAL-GRAVITATIONAL FIELD FORMS GRAVITY ZONES. .................... 32
3.7 WHAT MAKES PLANETS AND STARS TRY TO MOVE
TOWARDS ONE ANOTHER? ....................................................................................... 35
3.8 DOPA THEORY AND THE ROCHE LIMIT .................................................................... 38
3.9 ABSORPTION THEORY AND OUR OCEANIC TIDES ................................................. 44
3.10 HOW DOES DOPA DIFFERENTIAL GRAVITY EXERT ITS FORCE
INTERNALLY WITHIN BODIES? .................................................................................. 47
CHAPTER 4 - A GOOD THEORY SHOULD ANSWER ALL RELEVANT QUESTIONS ........................ 57
4.1 HOW DOES THE THEORY EXPLAIN WHY INTERSTELLAR
DUST CLOUDS FORM INTO PLANETS AND STARS? ............................................... 57
4.2 HOW DOES THE THEORY EXPLAIN HOW GRAVITATIONAL WAVES
CREATE A FORCE THAT TRIES TO MAKE LARGE OBJECTS SUCH
AS PLANETS AND STARS SPHERICAL? ................................................................... 57
4.3 HOW DOES THE THEORY EXPLAIN WHY THE SAME FORCE-CREATION
MECHANISM THAT CREATES A STAR DOES NOT CRUSH A SMALL
OBJECT SUCH AS A HUMAN INTO THE SHAPE OF A SPHERE? ........................... 57
4.4 HOW DOES THE THEORY EXPLAIN WHY POTENTIAL GRAVITY
ZONES ARE CREATED AROUND COSMIC BODIES THAT REDUCE
IN INTENSITY AWAY FROM THOSE BODIES? ........................................................... 58
4.5 DOES THE THEORY EXPLAIN HOW GRAVITATIONAL FORCE
APPLIES ITSELF SO THAT SATELLITES CAN MAINTAIN A
CIRCULAR OR ELLIPTICAL ORBIT AROUND A PLANET? ....................................... 58
4.6 HOW DOES THE THEORY EXPLAIN PHENOMENA SUCH AS ELLIPTICAL,
ASYMMETRICAL, AND OTHER ROGUE ORBITS SUCH AS MERCURY’S? ............. 69
4.7 HOW DOES THE THEORY EXPLAIN WHY LIGHT IS BENT WHEN IT
PASSES CLOSE TO THE SUN AND OTHER DENSE COSMIC BODIES? ................. 69
4.8 DOES THE THEORY CONFLICT WITH WHY THE FORCE OF GRAVITY
WOULD APPEAR, ACCORDING TO THEORETICAL CALCULATION,
TO INCREASE TOWARDS THE CENTRE OF THE EARTH UNTIL
THE OUTER FACE OF THE OUTER CORE IS REACHED? ....................................... 74
4.9 HOW DOES THE THEORY EXPLAIN WHY HEAVY METALS
AND MINERALS SINK PREFERENTIALLY DOWNWARD
WITHIN THE MOLTEN PLANET TO FORM THE CORE?............................................ 77
4.10 HOW DOES THE THEORY FIT IN WITH THE CONCEPT OF
AN EXPANDING UNIVERSE WHOSE EDGES APPEAR TO BE
EXPANDING OUTWARD AT AN ACCELERATING RATE? ......................................... 79
4.11 DOES THE THEORY FIT IN WITH WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT
HOW STARS DEVELOP? ............................................................................................. 81
4.12 HOW DOES THIS THEORY’S MECHANISM FIT IN WITH THE
FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF BLACK SHELL STARS
(INAPPROPRIATELY KNOWN AS BLACK HOLES)? ................................................. 81
4.13 CAN THIS THEORY EXPLAIN WHY ORBITING OBJECTS SUCH AS
SATELLITES DO NOT SLOW DOWN AS THEY CONTINUALLY RUN INTO
ONCOMING GRAVITATIONAL WAVES THAT COULD CREATE DRAG? .................. 94
4.14 DOES THIS THEORY HAVE OUTCOMES THAT MATCH AND SUPPORT
EINSTEIN’S THEORIES OF RELATIVITY?.................................................................. 95
4.15 DOES THIS THEORY CONTRADICT THE WORK OF NEWTON OR EINSTEIN? ..... 96
4.16 DOES THE ABSORPTION THEORY MEAN THAT GRAVITATIONAL
WAVES MUST BE GETTING WEAKER THROUGHOUT THE UNIVERSE?............... 97
4.17 DOES THE DOPA ABSORPTION THEORY OFFER AN EXPLANATION FOR
THE UNEXPECTED AND PREVIOUSLY-UNEXPLAINED RESULTS OF A
TREE GROWTH EXPERIMENT CONDUCTED ON THE
INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION IN 2009? ............................................................ 98
4.18 HAS DOPA THEORY PRODUCED ANY NEW CONCEPTS AND
EXPLANATIONS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN PROPOSED BY OTHERS? ...................104
CHAPTER 5 - HAVE THERE BEEN ANY NEW OUTCOMES
FROM THE DEVELOPMENT OF DOPA THEORY? ........................................................... 107
5.1 THE USE OF THE PRINCIPLES OF THIS THEORY TO EXPLAIN
THE CREATION AND MECHANISM OF BOTH INERTIA AND MOMENTUM,
WHETHER LINEAR OR ROTATIONAL......................................................................107
5.2 THE PROPOSITION THAT INERTIA AND MOMENTUM ARE THE IDENTICAL
SAME THING CAUSED BY THE SAME MECHANISM. ... ........................................117
5.3 ABSORPTION THEORY HAS PROVIDED THE EXPLANATION FOR WHY AN
INDEPENDENT PIECE OF LABORATORY WORK SHOWS HOW
GRAVITATIONAL FORCE IS AFFECTED BY LIGHT. ...............................................118
5.4 THE DEVELOPMENT OF DOPA THEORY HAS PROMPTED THE AUTHOR
TO OUTLINE SOME OF THE CONSEQUENTIAL OUTCOMES ON THE
DEVELOPMENT OF GRAVITATIONAL FORCE WITHIN A PLANET OR STAR......125
5.5 THE PROPOSITION THAT THERE MAY BE A MAXIMUM FORCE THAT
NATURE CAN EXERT, A MAXIMUM PRESSURE THAT NATURE CAN CREATE,
A MAXIMUM DENSITY OF MATERIAL THAT NATURE CAN CREATE,
THUS PREVENTING THE FORMATION OF A SINGULARITY, AND A CORE
WITHOUT GRAVITY OR INERTIA OWING TO THE LACK OF THE
PRESENCE OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVES WITHIN IT. ............................................131
5.6 THE WORK ON THE POSSIBLE EVOLUTION AND CONSTRUCTION OF
BLACK SHELL STARS (BLACK HOLES) HAS HIGHLIGHTED THE
PROPOSAL THAT GRAVITATIONAL WAVES ARE THE ONLY WAVE TYPE
ABLE TO ENTER AND THEN LEAVE A BLACK SHELL STAR THROUGH
ITS BLACK SHELL STRUCTURE (EVENT HORIZON). ..........................................133
5.7 THE AUTHOR HAS INVESTIGATED SOME OF THE WEAKNESSES
AND FAILINGS IN THE MATHEMATICAL EQUATION THAT NEWTON’S
THEORY SUBSEQUENTLY CREATED TO SUPPORT HIS PROPOSAL
FOR THE GRAVITATIONAL FORCE OF ATTRACTION...........................................133
5.8 ABSORPTION THEORY SUGGESTS THAT MAGNETIC MATERIAL
PROPERTIES MAY POSSIBLY BE OF INDIRECT HELP IN
THE STUDY OF GRAVITATIONAL FORCE..............................................................153
CHAPTER 6 - WHY OTHER GRAVITATIONAL WAVE THEORIES DO NOT WORK. .. 155
6.1 SIMPLE GRAVITATION WAVE PRESSURE.............................................................155
6.2 GRAVITATION WAVE PRESSURE PLUS
GRAVITATIONAL RADIATION BY MATTER. ..........................................................156
CHAPTER 7 - CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................ 159
APPENDIX 1 - ROBERTS’ 1978 PAPER. A THEORY OF GRAVITATIONAL REPULSION ........... 161
Would you like to have all the knowledge that is in these diagrams, as well as in the other 80 diagrams and illustrations in my book?
If so, just buy it!
Rock Slope Engineering
Peter Roberts
Rock Face Stability
Rock Mechanics
Reinforced Soil
Stereonet
GRAVITY
Prof Dr Peter Roberts
GRAVITY - How Gravity is Created. A new theory for the 21st Century.
Published by Russet Publishing 2018. 185 US-letter-sized pages.
£5.49. A high-resolution PDF file is downloaded to your computer or laptop and is locked to your personal email address for your security. See our TERMS for necessary details.
This modern book is written in simple, non-mathematical English so that it can be read by any person interested in this important subject. The book is fully illustrated with colour photographs, images, and diagrams for clarity of explanation.
The overall purpose of this book is to tell you that there is a new way to think about what gravity is, how it is created in nature, how the Universal Gravitational Field is created and how it controls all matter in the universe.
Having explained and justified the new theory, Peter goes on to extrapolate it to explain how inertia and momentum are created. He presents several chapters in which he speculates on the impact of his new theory on the formation of black holes in general and on the extreme nature of the internal structure of super-massive black holes where inertia and momentum may not exist! There is a chapter examining and critiquing Newton's equation for the calculation of gravitational force, and explaining the flaws contained within it.
This is the first time that a satisfactory, reasoned, theory has been proposed to replace Minkowski's concept of four-dimensional spacetime and to frame gravity in accordance with our known three-dimensional laws of physics. Neither Newton nor Einstein were able to do this. This is the first time that you will be able to visualise gravity and how it works.
ISBN 978-1-910537-35-0
THEY ALL LIKED IT—SEE IF YOU LIKE IT BEFORE YOU BUY
THIS OFFER IS ONLY AVAILABLE FROM RUSSET PUBLISHING
High definition electronic PDF version with no print/post delay.
You can download to any device of your choice. For example, your work computer, your personal PC/laptop, your tablet or your smartphone. It's up to you.
Buy directly from us at Russest Publishing
£5.49 VAT-free. (No P&P. No print cost, no retail costs, and no postal delay.)
Add to cart and set quantity required on the cart page
THESE ARE SOME OF THE 100+ FIGURES AND COLOURED PHOTOGRAPHS FROM THE BOOK
WHEN YOU BUY AN INNOVATIVE BOOK, YOU NEED TO KNOW EXACTLY WHAT IS IN IT AND WHAT YOU ARE BUYING.
SCROLL DOWN AND READ ON:
By clicking "Add to Cart", you confirm that you have read and agreed to our terms of business and payment procedures.
If you aren't sure whether to buy this book, please read all of these honest opinions from impartial readers.
Then read the contents listing below, and finally, admire the detailed diagrams and images you will find there.
Unsolicited testimonials from ordinary scientific readers ranging from school student to PhDs.
“There is probably no natural phenomenon more fascinating and directly relevant to humanity than gravity. Attempts to explain gravity predate the important contributions made by Galileo Galilei, Robert Hooke and mathematical physicist Isaac Newton. However, none of those nor earlier investigators were able to shed light on the underlying cause. Many, certainly not all, astrophysicists now subscribe to Albert Einstein's general relativity theory, but beyond that theory's complex 4-D space-time mathematics there remains wanting the scientific basis for gravitation, an explanation for what exactly draws an apple from the tree toward the center of earth. “GRAVITY - How Gravity is Created" by Dr. Peter Roberts presents a refreshingly new look at the problem, supported by novel and rational explanations ranging from earth to cosmic science. “This book is well written, amply illustrated and well worth reading - Rodney Savidge, PhD, Principal Investigator of the 2009 APEX-Cambium experiment on the International Space Station (ISS).”
“I do think you have in this book a very excitingly new perspective that, of course, is likely to be firstly ignored, then soundly criticized and challenged, but I think it may just be able to withstand those tests. [R.A.S.]
I have reason to believe your theory is credible as well as provable and should be found in the library of every research facility and university where scientists and students are most prone to reading without interruption. (D.W.]
Thank you for the opportunity to read this remarkable work. [H.G.K.]
Newton was reported to have stated that his work was relevant only because he could stand on the shoulders of past giants. Your work is, of course, a step beyond. [H.G.K.]
Congratulations on your publication. We know it was hard work. We are certain that it will contribute to the advancement of the understanding of this great phenomenon of nature and to the development of new technologies. [D.L.M.] Member of The Gravity Club.
I know that your book will be of interest to the general public [G.D.]
I think it's perfect! [P.B.]
I believe you have an effective presentation suitable for any college level student to understand. [D.W.]
This book is really well explained with fine pictures and easy-to-understand vocabulary. I couldn't see any possible improvement. Nice Work. [S.P.]
I like the idea of your proposal as it makes more sense… [W.N.]
What I like the most about your book is your strict logical reasoning. The mechanism of gravitational waves is nicely explained and it fits the observations. It is a good read! [P.T.]
It would be a great textbook for your class. [C.W.]
There is no doubt that because it is so well written and full of interest, it should be well received by the general public. [G.N.]
I hope that your thinking gathers traction, acting as a catalyst in bettering understanding for mankind. [M.D.]
I am half way through your theory and I am enjoying it very much. Finally we may just have a breakthrough that is so much needed. You have dispelled spacetime which is monumental in my view, but think about it—do they really deserve you yet ? No! I would just like to say I magnificently admire your valiant approach and will wholeheartedly follow you whatever you need. You are a hero in my eyes. [A.L.]
Thank you for the book, it really is the new angle of thinking. I think most importantly it should be available to all the readers, especially to students who would think and develop on it more. [N.S.]
I do accept the tenet that the gravitational field creates a drag effect. Not to question whether the effect is real or not, I accept it as a pillar of your work. Your theory is very fertile ground for expanding backwards into field theory. Your principle of drag effect may point to a way of reconciling the trinity of electric, magnetic and gravitational theory. I agree 100% with your observation about Einstein, who understood the limitations of his theories and knew he was plugging in fudge factors to make it work, but then that all got forgotten as the rest became “settled science”. [M.P.S.]
Such a great theory. [M.P.S.]
I have no problem with your theory of gravity - it's an interesting hypothesis, which could well be true. [P.S.]
It's clear that you are entirely persuaded about the correctness of your ideas, and frankly I think they're brilliant and deserve very serious consideration. [R.A.S.]
I am very interested in how you, a civil engineer with an apparent focus on geotechnology, as well as a side interest in languages, came to create a theory that to me, a lowly engineering student, seems to be the Ockham's Razor for modern physics? [J.C.B.]
It is well written and easy to follow, proposing a blindingly obvious and satisfyingly unifying theory, which explains a lot more than past theories of gravitation. (Bear in mind that my physics stops at first year BSc). I really like the way that you can so easily explain the basic principles so early in the book. Including the concept of why there is so much omnidirectional background gravitational wave flux. [N.C.]
Pay by PayPal or card
The United Kingdom has a fine, centuries-old, tradition of free scientific speech, conducted through the self-printing and dissemination of new, often controversial, inventions and theories. In most instances, in the distant past, this was in the form of privately-funded monographs which were circulated and often presented by the authors at meetings of 'philosophical' societies. Most of the world's fundamental discoveries and developments were published and 'forced' onto a reluctant scientific commumity by private researchers who were convinced of the correctness, importance, and potential value of their work.
Consider the following questions with their obvious answers:
Was Newton's theory of gravitation 'Principia' peer reviewed? Did a team of scientists have to visit the orchard to watch the fabled apple fall? No!
Was the British mathematcian Boole's work on Boolean logic (on which all modern
computer programming is based) peer reviewed? No!
Was the German/Swiss Einstein's 'Special Theory of Relativity' peer reviewed? No!
Were the British scientists Patrick Matthew's 1831 and Alfred Wallace's earlier work and Wallace's subsequent joint 1858 publication with Charles Darwin on species peer reviewed? No!
(Charles Darwin subsequently published his own work using a better 'publicity machine'.)
Was the British Scientist Charles Darwin's 1859 'The Origin of Species' peer reviewed? No!
Was the German Georgius Agricola's 'De re Metallica' peer reviewed in 1556? No!
Was the British Doctor Edward Jenner's invention of vaccination in 1796 and his publication peer reviewed? No!
Today we are blessed with the internet, and so Professor Roberts doesn't have to print his work on paper and hand out a few copies. No, he can do what he does here - put it out on the internet and thus allow anyone who is interested to read it - worldwide!
How Gravity is Created
A new theory for the 21st Century
